smilkovpetko wrote:Cardinalsin wrote:Yes Duki. Because the argument at that point was based on what research was done on the client side from the original WoW DVD set. Case not proven. If you want to redress the issue again with fresh evidence you need to go back to the source.
Crestfall devs are really, really good. They really, really care about getting their realms right from the start. If you really believe you are correct, which you do of course, then take up the challenge again. But you'll need to bring your A-team with you and have your facts straight.
Cornholi wrote:I personally was never convinced that
Holy resistance was set at anything other than 0, so I did some digging and found this:
https://youtu.be/7NagvKFLngU?list=LLbfL ... 90gQ&t=315http://www.warcraftmovies.com/movieview.php?id=16233 (warcraft movies link confirming it's actually from vanilla)
This
is a pvp video from a Demo Lock PoV with a felhunter pet, the warlock has specced into Master Demonologist so it would give him and the pet 60
resistance to all.
Now according to the original thread on the CF forums and people in this thread, any buff that has a mask of 126 will give you
resistance to everything including
holy, which if you follow that logic includes Master Demonologist:
http://db.vanillagaming.org/?spell=23762So that's 60
resistance to the warlock and the pet which should according to their logic should include
holy resistance, but as you see in the video none of the pallies' spells and attack were resisted at all, not even partially resisted, you can see for yourself as the warlock in the video has his combat log open. There were 2 duels in total in which the paladin got mutiple Seal of Command procs, Judgement of Command casts, Exorcism casts, HOJ and Repentance and none of them were resisted at all, not even partially.
I'd like to think that this proves that
holy resistance for all intents and purposes does NOT exist, feel free to prove me wrong on this claim.
This
is enough Evidence , nothing else i need to prove
I am not planning to go on such server at all , even if it happen to be most successful in the world , the attitude of Admins and the Racism issued by Indra (Crestfall Staff)
is not acceptable and shows high unprofessional GM's .
you do realize it was quite a few BL people that did some digging on the issue since nost was still alive (prismcharm hello)
without bugged prismcharm, noone would've known that player
holy resist was busted on Nost (already fixed
holy resist on stock CMANGOS)
which proved that
holy resist was broken on Nost with a "broken" item. haha go figure eh? it took a bug to find a bug.
meanwhile, Nano kept shooting down all
holy resist bug reports without doing proper research.
after more digging on CF staff with Darkrasp, we found more info based from QSW and how the client
is giving
holy resist via Mask 126(all resist schools including
holy resist school 2).
so then we found that blizzard was lazy and did NOT do a client patch to revert those aura 126 to aura 124. instead, they were lazy and just did a server side overwrite for it across the board.
then Cornholi finally found tangible video evidence from 2006 (not 2008+ wotlk crap that everyone ratted on duki and theoloras about) to help reinforce it.
so yes.. Nost needs to take a look at Cmangos and do some more rewrites.
but hey.. dont forget the prismcharm either.
if it wasnt for that item,
holy resist would still be an issue on Nostlysium.
your welcomed.
Team Blacklisted & Crestfall Staff.
below
is the CMangos link:
https://github.com/cmangos/mangos-classic/blob/f9abcf3304e16a74348f82a09f734f05e01e2c0d/src/game/Unit.cpp#L1950