JimboPete wrote:They are bots, if you haven't seen my videos, they prove this whole server are bots.
You and I: Both bots.
JimboPete wrote:Noxm wrote:Garfunkel wrote:To note, the numbers aren't 100% correct as, for example, I have four Horde characters that I don't really play but I wanted to reserve the names for future.
[...]
This was a scan of ppl online ...
They are bots, if you haven't seen my videos, they prove this whole server are bots.
You and I: Both bots.
|
|
|
Noxm wrote:Garfunkel wrote:To note, the numbers aren't 100% correct as, for example, I have four Horde characters that I don't really play but I wanted to reserve the names for future.
[...]
This was a scan of ppl online ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
waffle wrote:Oats wrote:Hey guys,
I was able to come up with a way to fix the census addon given the server's buggy who command.
Here is the change I made to the CensusPlus.lua
REPLACE: if (numWhoResults > MAX_WHO_RESULTS) then
WITH: if (numWhoResults == MAX_WHO_RESULTS) then
The way the server works now, numWhoResults will return 49 even if there are 100 results. By forcing it to break down the 49 results, it should get everyone on the server with each pull.
nice, will test it, thanks!Fraxx wrote:i just did a /census prune 14 and it deleted 500 characters ... i'm kinda speechless right now.
Ya well, 14 days is kinda a lot for a fresh server like this, but only 500 characters seems still pretty low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|