Cowiee wrote:Im reading through my old reply, and I struggle. Where did I say that the adrenal gland was a CNS structure? Also when you say the adrenal gland is down-stream of the hypophysis, you mean the adrenal cortex, ATCH etc?
As far as I know, no hypophyseal hormone is able to trigger the release of catecholamines from the adrenal medulla.
The adrenal medulla requires direct CNS input arriving from the lateral horn of the spinal cord T1 to L2, before it begins releasing its catecholamines, and this makes it only down-stream of the CNS itself, and no other gland.
The adrenal medulla is made out of the same tissue embryologically as the PNS (neural crest) and CNS (ectoderm). The adrenal medulla is essentially a modified "ganglion", in which the neurons acquired the ability to secrete hormones, thus making them neuroendocrine cells.
To say that there is barely if any connection between CNS and the adrenal gland would lead to instant failure in any neuroanatomy exam in any respectable medical school around the world.
Here is the point, receiving input from the CNS =/= part of the CNS. When a structure is not part of something, I would consider it to be "removed".
The original argument I made was that cognition is unlikely to occur in a structure not in the CNS. I'm sure you can agree. Adrenal medulla is most definitely not a CNS structure, we've both stated that. In fact I would go further to say cognition doesn't occur in most CNS structures! I think our difference here comes from different backgrounds, if I was a clinician I would probably say a part of the ANS is close to the CNS, but as someone who works solely on the brain, I would consider it removed. To mirror your example, saying that you want to study cognition in the adrenal medulla would get your NIH grant laughed out of the study section.
I find it interesting that you want to say a gland is very closely connected to the CNS, but that two areas within the gland are so distinct that signals directed toward one do not influence the other. Are these two parts of the same gland "removed" then? I see we can draw distinctions within the same gland, but drawing distinctions between two systems is out of line. This dichotomy makes me think you're really just here for an argument. Hormones directed to the cortex do in fact influence the medulla, triggering the synthesis of the catecholamines you mentioned.
We can swing our dicks around all day, but in all honesty I was just trying to give that kid a bollocking. Of course I figure that's why you're here too. Just a big circle of bollocking.