Solmyr wrote:(In before lock)
Quote from the previous thread:
Just wanted to mention that I am pleasantly surprised at the way the interrogation was conducted. What Plask refers to as extortion is in fact a standard legal procedure in courts all over the world where the defendant is offered mitigation of his sentence if he cooperates with the authorities. I am not commenting on whether "ratting out fellow guildies" should be applauded or not, this choice is up to the individual player, but the fact Nostalrius offer this option bespeaks a level of professionalism I had not seen yet.
Disclaimer: I provide no comment on whether or not the rules that govern these particular bans are too strict and severe or not. The above is merely my opinion on the manner of enforcement of the existing rules and the practices employed in that.
Yeah dude let's talk about standard legal procedure since you mention it.
In a standard legal procedure you get to know the identity of the person interrogating you, don't you ? I wouldn't even bother to answer to a GM that isn't telling me who he is. It could be a troll. Would you let yourself be arrested without checking this guy is a real cop ?
GMs didn't ban nor remove all the black lotus a lot of people camped for days and days when the nodes had static spawn locations.They recognized it was a bug and the staff's fault regarding scripts.
Later on with AV, black lotus ppl got from yet another bug that remained alive after testing were partially deleted.
Now same problem but different sentence : fail scripts, bug happens and ppl get bans before they get the chance to realise it's actually a bug and report it.
Everything I knew about Case Law in European and American judiciary systems as well as common sense is being questionned. It is the exact same facts and circumstances, yet the sentences are different.
This series of ban sounds too much like some sort of mafia or witch hunting. Those players just bought items to a NPC and they've been asked to rat out everyone like it's some sort of elaborated and illegal black market. It's not even affecting the server's economy at all. One could even argue people are lead to camp DMF vendors because of the "blizzlike" rates we have for nodes when the population of the server isn't blizzlike, at all. It has been months since we want slightly faster/dynamic/whatever nodes respawn rates. This "bug" is actually something the community wants, since months. Dynamic respawn timers on mobs was a good thing. Why not extending it to nodes/limited supplies ?
Anyways, these players don't deserve a perma ban for something they might have not realised. Not even the GM knew about this bug.
"I was not aware that the vendor inventory was refreshing every 2 minutes" Considering the fact it's not proven that these players knew the fast respawn of supplies was a bug, malicious intent isn't proven. I didn't (and still don't) know what the respawn time of each single items sold by DMF vendors should be. That's the developers task and to some extent the testers' one by helping them preventing this kind of situations, not mine. If it failed, it shouldn't be on the players shoulders. This is the level of professionalism I would be pleasantly suprised to see.
It should have lead to deletion of the items they bought as well as warnings and to some extent temporary bans. Some way more serious offenses have been committed concerning "bug abuses" and they got away with temporary bans, not permanent ones.